LogFAQs > #909752726

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicMaking sexual harassment claims that are over 30 years old.
darkknight109
10/01/18 3:46:02 AM
#270:


GreenKnight127 posted...
No. It has everything to do with you just being a low-profile peasant human who will never be in the public eye and make enemies in high places. Run for Supreme Court. Watch what happens. Skeletons you didn't even know existed will come out of the closet to haunt you.

No thanks, doesn't appeal to me, plus I'm not in legal. That said, if I ever do apply for a high profile job (whether that's running for political office, seeking membership on the board of directors for a high profile company, or something else that would similarly put me in the public spotlight), I will acknowledge and accept that my background will be gone over with a fine tooth comb, because that's exactly how it should be. If someone is being granted a high level of power, I want to know that they are trustworthy, above and beyond what I would expect from an average person, so I fully expect to be subjected to the exact same scrutiny (and if the thought of that scrutiny ever proves disquieting, for any reason, I would avoid those high profile jobs in the first place).

GreenKnight127 posted...
Oh? You didn't even make a Facebook post at all in 2006? Doesn't matter. Someone made one for you. Now you need to prove to the country that you DIDN'T make it. Have fun!

That's pretty straightforward - Facebook wasn't even public until the end of that year, and I've never had a Facebook profile my entire life (which all my friends and acquaintances - some of whom have pestered me for years to abandon my "Luddite ways" would be happy to attest to). I wouldn't need to get emotional or defensive, because it would be easily disproven and any accuser who falsely attributed such things to me would be quickly proven a liar.

GreenKnight127 posted...
Sheeple mindset.

Sheeple.

You know, I appreciate you using this word unironically in your post, because it tells me exactly how seriously I should take it.

Brocknoth posted...
An "attempted assault" (again no substantial evidence to support the claim) ways FAR less then someone who was tried, convicted, and found guilty of being a pedophile. Again intent and severity. Petty theft? (candy, small items) No. Serial murder? Yes. Use common sense.

Attempted rape seems pretty bad to me, man.

You never answered my question, though - how long ago does an attempted rape have to have happened for it to be A-OK in your books?

Krazy_Kirby posted...
so to you "looked into" = guilty.

Has anyone in this topic even said anything that even remotely sounds like this? Because I sure don't see it. In fact, I've seen several people say the exact opposite of this.

Seems pretty flimsy, even for a Strawman argument.
---
Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster.
Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror!
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1