LogFAQs > #910555504

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	The Gender studies hoax - fake papers passing peer review
scar the 1 10/15/18 7:48:12 AM #16:	COVxy posted... scar the 1 posted... What aren't you buying? They didn't check vs a control group. That's very basic, and without it there's no conclusion to be drawn about the gender studies field. You know this. Fucking Nature published a paper on how water has memory. And to the extent other fields have this same issue, there's trouble in those fields as well. Yeah, I agree. But they (and you) have no basis for singling out gender studies like this. In their case, they're very obviously being dishonest, implying an agenda to make the field look bad, and make it look like "less serious science". In your case idk. --- Everything has an end, except for the sausage. It has two. <cite>scar the 1 posted [p:910555504] in The Gender... [t:77099140]...</cite> <quote><cite>COVxy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scar the 1 posted...</cite> <quote>What aren't you buying? They didn't check vs a control group. That's very basic, and without it there's no conclusion to be drawn about the gender studies field. You know this. Fucking Nature published a paper on how water has memory.</quote> And to the extent other fields have this same issue, there's trouble in those fields as well.</quote> Yeah, I agree. But they (and you) have no basis for singling out gender studies like this. In their case, they're very obviously being dishonest, implying an agenda to make the field look bad, and make it look like "less serious science". In your case idk. --- Everything has an end, except for the sausage. It has two.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1