LogFAQs > #910555708

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	The Gender studies hoax - fake papers passing peer review
knutjob 10/15/18 7:55:53 AM #20:	COVxy posted... scar the 1 posted... Yeah, I agree. But they (and you) have no basis for singling out gender studies like this. In their case, they're very obviously being dishonest, implying an agenda to make the field look bad, and make it look like "less serious science". In your case idk. I'm not saying I have any knowledge of the base rates in any other field, just that the observed base rate here is waaay too high. If discrimination of hoax work and real work is this low, that spells trouble for any field. It says more about the individual journals and very little about the field. <cite>knutjob posted [p:910555708] in The Gender... [t:77099140]...</cite> <quote><cite>COVxy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scar the 1 posted...</cite> <quote>Yeah, I agree. But they (and you) have no basis for singling out gender studies like this. In their case, they're very obviously being dishonest, implying an agenda to make the field look bad, and make it look like "less serious science". In your case idk.</quote> I'm not saying I have any knowledge of the base rates in any other field, just that the observed base rate here is waaay too high. If discrimination of hoax work and real work is this low, that spells trouble for any field.</quote> It says more about the individual journals and very little about the field.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1