LogFAQs > #910558644

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	The Gender studies hoax - fake papers passing peer review
scar the 1 10/15/18 9:44:02 AM #40:	COVxy posted... So either that's the baseline for false positives, or 28% of the time these uneducated lay people submitted real honest to god good work accidentally while trying to submit a hoax. The latter seems unreasonable. I don't agree with that binary dichotomy. But I agree you should read into it more if you're interested. From my perspective this was done by people with an agenda - to make "grievance studies" look as bad as possible. So they're not bound by trying to make a fair or repeatable study. Is there a problem within publishing? Yeah, we all agree on that. Is this problem bigger in gender studies? Nothing about this "study" actually supports that. --- Everything has an end, except for the sausage. It has two. <cite>scar the 1 posted [p:910558644] in The Gender... [t:77099140]...</cite> <quote><cite>COVxy posted...</cite> <quote>So either that's the baseline for false positives, or 28% of the time these uneducated lay people submitted real honest to god good work accidentally while trying to submit a hoax. The latter seems unreasonable.</quote> I don't agree with that binary dichotomy. But I agree you should read into it more if you're interested. From my perspective this was done by people with an agenda - to make "grievance studies" look as bad as possible. So they're not bound by trying to make a fair or repeatable study. Is there a problem within publishing? Yeah, we all agree on that. Is this problem bigger in gender studies? Nothing about this "study" actually supports that. --- Everything has an end, except for the sausage. It has two.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1