LogFAQs > #910558661

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	The Gender studies hoax - fake papers passing peer review
knutjob 10/15/18 9:44:29 AM #41:	Darkman124 posted... Yeah, I understand that your experience has been that 'this is not representative at all of how publishing is normally' That has also been my experience. I think it is always dangerous to try to extrapolate that personal experience to define a broader trend, and it may not be. A broader study would be very useful to the industry of scientific publishing as a whole. TBH, a study on resubmit rates for accepted publications would probably cover it for this. I used to work as an editor for nature. Most papers went through 3 or 4 resubmits before they are accepted. <cite>knutjob posted [p:910558661] in The Gender... [t:77099140]...</cite> <quote><cite>Darkman124 posted...</cite> <quote>Yeah, I understand that your experience has been that 'this is not representative at all of how publishing is normally' That has also been my experience. I think it is always dangerous to try to extrapolate that personal experience to define a broader trend, and it may not be. A broader study would be very useful to the industry of scientific publishing as a whole. TBH, a study on resubmit rates for accepted publications would probably cover it for this.</quote> I used to work as an editor for nature. Most papers went through 3 or 4 resubmits before they are accepted.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1