LogFAQs > #910573707

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	The Gender studies hoax - fake papers passing peer review
Anteaterking 10/15/18 2:52:05 PM #52:	COVxy posted... But that's just the thing. Publishing isn't a cake walk. It's a lot of time and effort with extremely hefty demands made by reviewers at each stage, at least in my field. My timecourse of publication attempts doesn't look too pretty: https://imgur.com/aCDrebO There's almost certainly field by field variation in the nature and rigor of peer review. In math, papers take a while to publish, but it's mostly the process from "table accept" to "referee report" that takes the longest. Usually the subsequent revisions and referee back and forth is quicker. --- http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b136/Anteaterking/scan00021.jpg http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b136/Anteaterking/scan00021.jpg <cite>Anteaterking posted [p:910573707] in The Gender... [t:77099140]...</cite> <quote><cite>COVxy posted...</cite> <quote>But that's just the thing. Publishing isn't a cake walk. It's a lot of time and effort with extremely hefty demands made by reviewers at each stage, at least in my field. My timecourse of publication attempts doesn't look too pretty: https://imgur.com/aCDrebO There's almost certainly field by field variation in the nature and rigor of peer review.</quote> In math, papers take a while to publish, but it's mostly the process from "table accept" to "referee report" that takes the longest. Usually the subsequent revisions and referee back and forth is quicker. --- http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b136/Anteaterking/scan00021.jpg http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b136/Anteaterking/scan00021.jpg</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1