LogFAQs > #911496560

Vincent's bad performance yestereday makes the Mewtwo is a fraud theory very likely. No more can we excuse Mewtwo's bad performance on Phoenix Wright by saying he dominated a near-elite named Vincent! This also ruins my pre-contest theory that Mewtwo > Pikachu >> Charizard. Apparently I got the Pikachu >> Charizard part right, but not the other part, it seems.

Now... these calculations are very, VERY rough... take everything with a grain of salt.

Extrapolating through Sonic, Mewtwo's 2013 x-stat is 45.63%. Extrapolating through Phoenix Wright, Mewtwo's x-stat is 34.09%. That suggests that Mewtwo's true strength could be worth as little as 37.35% on the fraud version. Granted, Sonic's x-stat is probably too high.

How does Charizard as a fraud compare? He's estimated to be at 34.22% if equal to Zelda. Let's assume Terra gets 40% on Kirby in 2013. Terra's new x-stat is 28.48. This suggests Charizard gets 58.38% on Terra. So basically, Charizard 2018 gets 44% on Charizard 2013. Granted, Terra may have increased. It's possible Charizard may not be much of a fraud at all.

Is Pikachu a fraud? 2013 x-stats suggests Pikachu gets 64.08% on Scorpion. He got 66%. Yeah, so Pikachu being a fraud seems pretty unlikely, especially with Sub-Zero's impressive score on Shulk.
---

"Ah, a party! We haven't had one of those. It could be fun! So... what is a party?" "Well, you drink punch and eat CAKE! ...I think."