LogFAQs > #912055506

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Politics Containment Topic 206: Acostin' Fragile Don's Pathetic Press Conference
Jakyl25 11/08/18 2:15:44 PM #209:	Jakyl25 posted... TheRock1525 posted... Jakyl25 posted... EDIT: If it means that ballot counters are allowed to ask who someone meant to vote for if for some reason the marking is unclear, I think I side against allowing that. Why? I think because of a slippery slope logical fallacy Im trying to work out of <_< To be more specific, I am imagining how it could be abused regarding strategic 3rd party voting Like in 2016 when I voted Stein, I could have deliberately made it unclear if I was voting for her or Hillary and then fixed my ballot afterwards based on the results, if I was allowed to get away with it --- Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large <cite>Jakyl25 posted [p:912055506] in Politics C... [t:77181966]...</cite> <quote><cite>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TheRock1525 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote>EDIT: If it means that ballot counters are allowed to ask who someone meant to vote for if for some reason the marking is unclear, I think I side against allowing that.</quote> Why?</quote> I think because of a slippery slope logical fallacy Im trying to work out of <_<</quote> To be more specific, I am imagining how it could be abused regarding strategic 3rd party voting Like in 2016 when I voted Stein, I could have deliberately made it unclear if I was voting for her or Hillary and then fixed my ballot afterwards based on the results, if I was allowed to get away with it --- Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1