LogFAQs > #912055963

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 206: Acostin' Fragile Don's Pathetic Press Conference
TheRock1525
11/08/18 2:23:03 PM
#211:


Jakyl25 posted...
Jakyl25 posted...
TheRock1525 posted...
Jakyl25 posted...
EDIT: If it means that ballot counters are allowed to ask who someone meant to vote for if for some reason the marking is unclear, I think I side against allowing that.


Why?


I think because of a slippery slope logical fallacy Im trying to work out of <_<


To be more specific, I am imagining how it could be abused regarding strategic 3rd party voting

Like in 2016 when I voted Stein, I could have deliberately made it unclear if I was voting for her or Hillary and then fixed my ballot afterwards based on the results, if I was allowed to get away with it


I think that would be easily solved if it was only about confirming what their vote appears to be, and not really allowing it to get something else.

I.e. "your vote appears to be for Jill Stein but its unclear, did you vote for Jill Stein?" And you say "no, I meant to vote for Hillary Clinton" then you just toss the ballot.
---
TheRock ~ I had a name, my father called me Blues.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1