LogFAQs > #912588025

creativename posted...

So I mean to humor that, that requires a bigger shift in 2005 between the parts than the idea that 2005 Mario gets like 65% on 2004 Samus. You realize that right?

What...?

Put it this way

Known values

Mario 2k5 = A bit over 43
Mario 2k4 = A bit over 37
Samus Raw in 2k5 = A bit over 34.
Samus Raw in 2k4 in a hypothetical match with Mario needed to get 60-40'd by 2k4 Mario = About 30

For 2k5 Mario to 65-35 2k4 Samus, Samus Raw vs Mario would need to be about 4 lower than it was in 2005

For 2k4 Samus to beat 2k4 Mario, Samus Raw vs Mario would need to be about 4 higher than it was in 2k5.

Basically what I'm saying is the assumption that 2k5 Mario 65-35s 2004 Samus is about the same number of stat fiddling as having Samus flip the script. Further I think because all the rest of Nintendo boosted in 2k5 and Samus outdid expectations vs Frog in 05, it makes more sense that Samus boosted in 2k5 than stayed static. Like Frog has always been a red flag in 2k5. Master Chief 2k5 60-40s 2k5 Frog, but Master Chief 2k5 is only 48-52 vs 2k4 Frog who = 2k4 Chief. Heavily implies Frog wasn't properly adjusted, which implies Samus wasn't. Especially since 2k4 Crono = 2k5 Crono.

Really the easy thing to is take 2k4 Mario value vs 2k5 Raw Samus which projects to Mario with 54-46 or so. Saying Samus wins in 04 is more of a leap than saying Mario 60-40s in 04, imo. You saying I lack credibility doesn't really change that.
---

No problem!
This is a cute and pop genocide of love!