LogFAQs > #912593941

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicNeo-Nazis Have No First Amendment Right to Harassment, Judge Rules
SchoolForAnts
11/17/18 11:09:31 PM
#80:


@shokan_warrior posted...
Kineth posted...
shokan_warrior posted...
I have no intention to harass anyone and I never have. I'm sorta ok with this but we need to properly define "harassment" so this is not used to silence people.


I have no idea how to feel about this post since you're admitting to being a Neo-Nazi. I suppose I'm ok with the fact that aren't hiding it unlike the rest of the ones here, but man.... that's a disgusting organization to be associated with.

There's a difference between the "neos" and the historical group as well as any other more serious groups

The neos are just hateful people clinging to something they think represents their ideas

I'm still in search of ideas and want to clarify that while I do look favorably on some of the ideas of national socialism i do not identify as, nor will I tolerate being called, a neo-nazi

The word has me thinking of skinheads and tattooed degenerates

I'm absolutely not such a person

To be honest I'm half trolling half sharing ideas to test their validity outside of my own head

Because of my "liking" of fascism I WILL tolerate being called a fascist or nazi as to me they are linked to a historical reality that is "respectable" in appearance and not the senseless hateful degeneracy of "neos"


In other words, you have a problem with the bad fashion choices and sloppy image, not with the whole white supremacist and racial hatred stuff.

This is the most stupid thing I have seen posted in any message board ever
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1