LogFAQs > #912614515

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	So that ff7 remake
Revelation34 11/18/18 12:00:19 PM #33:	ferko420 posted... FFXV had the worst production history of any game i can ever recall. this is the most unsurprising news ever... Duke Nukem Forever. Lokarin posted... What if they do to FF7 remake what they did to the FF3,4,5,6 remake.... make them worse in favour of looking like a mobile game They already are making the FF7 remake worse like those. Just not in the same way. Entity13 posted... SE has gone all-in on the current "games as a service" model and trend, so they must find ways to make ALL of the money, and convince you, the consumer, that you want to spend so much money this way. SE thinks that there's enough content up to docking the ship at Junon to make up one game, or at least charge one game's pricetag for that much of a larger game. As stupid and greedy as it seems, I have no doubt that a lot of people will buy it. Just like how, after the term "whale" was coined to describe people who spend copious amounts of money on cash shops, SE made a whale mount, cash shop only, for FFXIV. I'll let you guess how many FFXIV players bought this mount. (Also, it made no references to the whale in IV) #Whaleforwhales WTF. Isn't that like 10 hours into the original? Entity13 posted... The other major difference is that XIII was originally a singular, standalone game. It didn't need a sequel. There wasn't exactly a real ending for the first game. --- Gamertag: Kegfarms, BF code: 2033480226, Treasure Cruise code 318,374,355, Steam: Kegfarms <cite>Revelation34 posted [p:912614515] in So that ff... [t:77211595]...</cite> <quote><cite>ferko420 posted...</cite> <quote>FFXV had the worst production history of any game i can ever recall. this is the most unsurprising news ever...</quote> Duke Nukem Forever. <cite>Lokarin posted...</cite> <quote>What if they do to FF7 remake what they did to the FF3,4,5,6 remake.... make them worse in favour of looking like a mobile game</quote> They already are making the FF7 remake worse like those. Just not in the same way. <cite>Entity13 posted...</cite> <quote>SE has gone all-in on the current "games as a service" model and trend, so they must find ways to make ALL of the money, and convince you, the consumer, that you want to spend so much money this way. SE thinks that there's enough content up to docking the ship at Junon to make up one game, or at least charge one game's pricetag for that much of a larger game. As stupid and greedy as it seems, I have no doubt that a lot of people will buy it. Just like how, after the term "whale" was coined to describe people who spend copious amounts of money on cash shops, SE made a whale mount, cash shop only, for FFXIV. I'll let you guess how many FFXIV players bought this mount. (Also, it made no references to the whale in IV) #Whaleforwhales</quote> WTF. Isn't that like 10 hours into the original? <cite>Entity13 posted...</cite> <quote>The other major difference is that XIII was originally a singular, standalone game. It didn't need a sequel.</quote> There wasn't exactly a real ending for the first game. --- Gamertag: Kegfarms, BF code: 2033480226, Treasure Cruise code 318,374,355, Steam: Kegfarms</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1