LogFAQs > #912648939

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Contest Stats and Discussion - Part 1307
creativename 11/18/18 10:25:11 PM #488:	UltimaterializerX posted... Nothing ExTha is doing is dumber than people trying to defend 2004's x-stats and still trying to claim that Samus was ever, at any point, stronger than fucking MARIO. Imagine still defending such a stupid-ass pick a decade later. LOL X STATS AND LOL SAMUS > MARIO PEOPLE. You obsess over this stats vs. anti stats gibberish for some bizarre reason. This is about reasonable hypotheses vs. unreasonable hypotheses. UltimaterializerX posted... creativename posted... UltimaterializerX posted... creativename posted... If you predicted Mario with 60% and it wasnt because of a big Mario boost, you didnt have some brilliant foresight. You just got lucky. Mario blowing out Samus was not luck. Obviously the match itself cant be luck, if thats what youre saying. But predicting Mario with 60% without a big Mario boost and getting it right is indeed luck. Just like if you picked Cloud over Seph finals in 2K3 but KH had nothing to do with your logic. We have ample proof that Mario SFFs everything in Nintendo except Link and maybe Pokemon. There was no way that match was going to be anything but a blowout, and only the LOL X STATS people are dumb enough to try arguing otherwise. Manalytics > analytics. Saying Mario beats Samus every year via rSFF/SFF is entirely reasonable. Though are you claiming he was indirectly stronger than her in 2K4? I dont see how that would be unless Link SFFed Crono quite a bit, and I dont buy that. Mario got handled by Crono that year, and Samus did better on Cloud than Crono on Link. <cite>creativename posted [p:912648939] in Contest St... [t:77210151]...</cite> <quote><cite>UltimaterializerX posted...</cite> <quote>Nothing ExTha is doing is dumber than people trying to defend 2004's x-stats and still trying to claim that Samus was ever, at any point, stronger than fucking MARIO. Imagine still defending such a stupid-ass pick a decade later. LOL X STATS AND LOL SAMUS > MARIO PEOPLE.</quote> You obsess over this stats vs. anti stats gibberish for some bizarre reason. This is about reasonable hypotheses vs. unreasonable hypotheses. <cite>UltimaterializerX posted...</cite> <quote><cite>creativename posted...</cite> <quote><cite>UltimaterializerX posted...</cite> <quote><cite>creativename posted...</cite> <quote>If you predicted Mario with 60% and it wasnt because of a big Mario boost, you didnt have some brilliant foresight. You just got lucky.</quote> Mario blowing out Samus was not luck.</quote> Obviously the match itself cant be luck, if thats what youre saying. But predicting Mario with 60% without a big Mario boost and getting it right is indeed luck. Just like if you picked Cloud over Seph finals in 2K3 but KH had nothing to do with your logic.</quote> We have ample proof that Mario SFFs everything in Nintendo except Link and maybe Pokemon. There was no way that match was going to be anything but a blowout, and only the LOL X STATS people are dumb enough to try arguing otherwise. Manalytics > analytics.</quote> Saying Mario beats Samus every year via rSFF/SFF is entirely reasonable. Though are you claiming he was indirectly stronger than her in 2K4? I dont see how that would be unless Link SFFed Crono quite a bit, and I dont buy that. Mario got handled by Crono that year, and Samus did better on Cloud than Crono on Link.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1