LogFAQs > #912875733

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Which of these animated movies should Disney remake as live action?
Zeus 11/22/18 8:44:12 PM #52:	wah_wah_wah posted... Krazy_Kirby posted... MirMiros posted... None of them. I am against making live action versions of animated movies. what if there was a live action before the animated? like the jungle book Beauty and the Beast too. But it's not really the same thing. Taking a Disney version of a story and making live action is like colorizing black-and-white films. You mean improving on them? Entity13 posted... wah_wah_wah posted... Krazy_Kirby posted... MirMiros posted... None of them. I am against making live action versions of animated movies. what if there was a live action before the animated? like the jungle book Beauty and the Beast too. But it's not really the same thing. Taking a Disney version of a story and making live action is like colorizing black-and-white films. It's kinda of worse than that. At least colorization techniques try to match what's there. Live action remakes of cartoons will often add or change elements of scenes to the point where the characters are altered, or the point of a scene or overall plot are lost. The recent live action of Beauty and the Beast? It was heavy-handed in such alterations. The new adaptations are really just separate movies. I wouldn't even call them remakes, other than the fact that they include some characters Disney intro'd to the story --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:912875733] in Which of t... [t:77221781]...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Krazy_Kirby posted...</cite> <quote><cite>MirMiros posted...</cite> <quote>None of them. I am against making live action versions of animated movies.</quote> what if there was a live action before the animated? like the jungle book</quote> Beauty and the Beast too. But it's not really the same thing. Taking a Disney version of a story and making live action is like colorizing black-and-white films.</quote> You mean improving on them? <cite>Entity13 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Krazy_Kirby posted...</cite> <quote><cite>MirMiros posted...</cite> <quote>None of them. I am against making live action versions of animated movies.</quote> what if there was a live action before the animated? like the jungle book</quote> Beauty and the Beast too. But it's not really the same thing. Taking a Disney version of a story and making live action is like colorizing black-and-white films.</quote> It's kinda of worse than that. At least colorization techniques try to match what's there. Live action remakes of cartoons will often add or change elements of scenes to the point where the characters are altered, or the point of a scene or overall plot are lost. The recent live action of Beauty and the Beast? It was heavy-handed in such alterations.</quote> The new adaptations are really just separate movies. I wouldn't even call them remakes, other than the fact that they include some characters Disney intro'd to the story --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1