LogFAQs > #913035405

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	So we're firing tear gas at migrants.
Jiek_Fafn 11/25/18 8:51:53 PM #20:	Monolith1676 posted... Funkydog posted... Monolith1676 posted... Funkydog posted... Isn't tear gas what is commonly used to disperse crowds non lethally? Yep. This doesn't necessarily make it alright mind, as it is banned for use in war. Which tells you plenty about it, and makes it very odd it is okay to use on your own civilians, but not others. Tear gas is not bad at all. It is just banned in war because they bammed all forms of gas warfare. This It's a lot easier to outright ban chemical warfare than it is to create a million exceptions and risk having something awful used in war because of a loophole. --- PSN: Jiek FFRK: Tyro God Wall KZcv <cite>Jiek_Fafn posted [p:913035405] in So we're f... [t:77238979]...</cite> <quote><cite>Monolith1676 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Funkydog posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Monolith1676 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Funkydog posted...</cite> <quote>Isn't tear gas what is commonly used to disperse crowds non lethally?</quote> Yep.</quote> This doesn't necessarily make it alright mind, as it is banned for use in war. Which tells you plenty about it, and makes it very odd it is okay to use on your own civilians, but not others.</quote> Tear gas is not bad at all. It is just banned in war because they bammed all forms of gas warfare.</quote> This It's a lot easier to outright ban chemical warfare than it is to create a million exceptions and risk having something awful used in war because of a loophole. --- PSN: Jiek FFRK: Tyro God Wall KZcv</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1