LogFAQs > #913295451

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicTrump: Oh, I get it! I am a very good developer, happily living my life, when I
action52
11/30/18 8:17:35 AM
#22:


pegusus123456 posted...
gp1829 posted...
Caution999 posted...
Heres my biased take:

The original framers of the Constitution did not intend on Presidential impeachment to be something you can use to go back Before someone became President to try and get them out of office.

What was the guy supposed to do if he lost the election? He would pick up his business life where he left off. He was well within his right to continue running his businesses until the election was resolved. He had no choice but to continue to run his businesses until he was confirmed to have won the election. Well within his right.

How can one commit an abuse of their office if they arent even in office yet?

Now if its collusion to win the election, yes, thats a problem. Simply finding out Trump had a plan to build something over in Russia, while never going thru with it, for the sake of his business, is not collusion.

Try getting perfect proof. Pretend this is a trial for murder. We need to know EVERYTHING. I need a murder weapon. I need the dna evidence on the murder weapon and I need Trumps fingerprints on the weapon. I need the dead body. I need Trumps dna on the body. I need to know when this person was murdered and where Trump was at the time.

Lets get some real proof. Theres really strong reasonable doubt; especially when nothing was even built.


Very cool

much legal

Even if we accept that, there's also the fact that Trump lied about it...
---
i am truley sorry for your lots
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1