Revisionist history, most whites directly benefited from the new deal.
Most white people today do not have any tangible benefits from the new deal.
Anti-245 posted...
You still haven't answered what categories you're using for Asians and Indians because if you break it down, many of them are in the same boat as blacks. They simply take East Asians and certain Indians and over represent them. They never do it with African immigrants who have those same attributes as Asian and Indian immigrants on the high end.
So you want me to break down "Asian and Indian" into categories...but you refuse to break White into categories? Because you know that there are whites from different parts of the world and not all of them are necessarily doing well financially. That's hypocritical.
Anti-245 posted...
Whites still possess the majority of American wealth and while others have struggled, they're wealth actually rebounded quite nicely since 2007. Again, wealth is not income. You've already said it yourself though what you described is still not the totality of wealth.
I'm waiting: why do whites have 90% of all wealth here?
Factors that aid in building wealth are having a large income, not having children before marriage, not being a single parent household, and completing college with a relevant education. After that it's simply a matter of investing.
Income is the metric that actually matters.
So, now we're going to the old "income is the only thing that matters, blacks just need to xyz to fix it" like I knew you would. We could break whites down by wealth and show that hs dropouts have better job prospects and wealth accumulation that you could easily find but you're concerned about "income", which whites still ear more than blacks but enough to have 90% of the wealth. All the investing in world couldn't beat that, but you've yet to answer this massive disparity so we're done. ---