LogFAQs > #914098018

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
Topic12,000 people or all cats. You must sacrifice one.
kayoticdreamz
12/14/18 1:38:45 AM
#190:


Purple_Cheetah posted...
Easily pick the humans. They can repopulate and there's bound to be ones that are terminal or on death's door anyways. Not to mention all the poor and homeless we tend to turn a blind eye towards.

This whole scorched earth approach makes me laugh. Yeah, burn all the woods/forests, then burn all the structures, burn all the food, then burn the bodies. Then when you're done burning it all we'll just flood the earth and create waterworld. Yeah, I'm sure the 12k that were saved would rather not take part in that.

my boat...


exactly.

people who pick killing the cats should be sterilized and never allowed to vote. they are clearly a menace to society with their insane thinking. Science isn't going to solve what cats do. Even this hypothetical proposed fired has the problem of being a long term solution because lots of things eat rats. They are a "prey animal" aka meant to get eaten and killed. So basically we have to do what cats do on a constant steady basis and not do it too well because other things still have to eat rats. In essence if cats kill on average over 10 years, 500,000,000 rats then we have to devise a way to average that number exactly with no deviation.

kill the 12,000 anyone saying otherwise is worse than hitler and stalin combined.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1