LogFAQs > #914650099

wiiking96 posted...

@RoboLaserGandhi

You are an excellent example of the type of delusional people that I take issue with. While I'm sure that there are some people in existence who are similar to "people who want leverage in society...", they are much smaller in quantity than you think and are in no way representative of the majority of "SJWs" who genuinely want a more just society. You sound like you've been influenced by anti-SJW propaganda, with this part of your post being key:

it's actively hunting down and eliminating anything that isn't progressive. It's this pervasive idea wholly resembling McCarthyism.

Do you honestly think that these "SJWs" that you so despise have any real power to "hunt down and eliminate" media that they deem unacceptable? Hell, even one of the most notorious individuals that anti-SJWs love to complain about, Anita Sarkeesian, doesn't propose getting rid of video game media containing what she considers problematic messages. Most SJWs just want more media to be made containing progressive messages.

Yeah I know you take issue with my type because we're the ones with enough mental aptitude to debate you without going "hurrrr SJWs!!!" at every instance. Change of pace for you, difficult to adapt to. I get it.

Again, the heart of this argument all comes down to just where you draw the line on what constitutes an SJW and how you measure the vocality of extremists, so I really won't bother with that part. I could tell you that SJWs actually do something and you could just come back and say those are the vocal minority.

But when you give me a specific example like Anita Sarkeesian, I can debate that for sure. Her videos basically read like a college freshman assignment to take issue with a random subject and argue it. Her videos are all about taking issue with specific instances, not "wanting more media to be made containing progressive messages". And she has been monumentally influential in the video game industry in seeding these ideas.