LogFAQs > #914794753

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicIs it fair to exploit an ethnic group if their DNA has a cure for some disease?
Kyuubi4269
12/27/18 6:57:06 PM
#29:


_AdjI_ posted...
Kyuubi4269 posted...
They are both depriving people of sovereignty of their body to save lives.


For one thing, most personal safety-related laws tend to also increase the safety of those around the person (hence things like skydiving, bungee jumping, and mountain climbing are legal, despite being personally risky). For another, they tend to be such blatant common sense that one could easily argue that anyone who doesn't want to follow them shouldn't be considered competent enough to make their own decisions. For another, one of those two is vastly more invasive than the other, rendering them pretty incomparable.

"Tend" is quite a way of tying irrelevant shit to my point. What effects others is not applicable to my point and you know it.

To your actual point, it's more invasive as it's more successful. It also doesn't matter to you once you're dead.

Miroku_of_Nite1 posted...
*in the hospital after a minor accident*
Doctor: Hmm, the card say's he's a donor and he's not married and has no kids. Lawrence the drunk needs a new kidney, and Ethel Banks the millionaire needs a new heart. Whoops, what do you know the guy just died.

This is why for-profit hospitals should have to pay for all body parts.
---
Doctor Foxx posted...
The demonizing of soy has a lot to do with xenophobic ideas.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1