LogFAQs > #914870686

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicJon Jones goes ham at female reporter who questioned his latest drug violations.
codey
12/29/18 10:03:55 AM
#28:


From what Jeff Novitzky said, he only testes positive for the long term metabolites, which provide no no benefit or something. The period in which he was tested was close enough to a previous test (like 20 days) that he would have had to test positive to for the short and medium term metabolites as well, but was clean. The going theory is that it's a pulsing effect with the long term metabolites.

That's not to say Jon isn't a POS idiot, but I'm not sure he actually took anythingthis time. This is the same steroid he tested positive for the last time, but there's no indication of the metabolites that should be present if he ingested it between tests. Not to mention the tested levels in his tests have always been at 0 or so microscopic an account they were determined by outside arbitrators to be of no benefit to performance.
---
*runs out of topic naked*
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1