LogFAQs > #914871994

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Jon Jones goes ham at female reporter who questioned his latest drug violations.
codey 12/29/18 10:50:48 AM #30:	Balrog0 posted... codey posted... From what Jeff Novitzky said, he only testes positive for the long term metabolites, which provide no no benefit or something. The period in which he was tested was close enough to a previous test (like 20 days) that he would have had to test positive to for the short and medium term metabolites as well, but was clean. The going theory is that it's a pulsing effect with the long term metabolites. That's not to say Jon isn't a POS idiot, but I'm not sure he actually took anythingthis time. This is the same steroid he tested positive for the last time, but there's no indication of the metabolites that should be present if he ingested it between tests. Not to mention the tested levels in his tests have always been at 0 or so microscopic an account they were determined by outside arbitrators to be of no benefit to performance. The problem is USADA has suspended others that have similar stories and testing histories, like Frank Mir. Even if you think the story is plausible, and it is, it's a different decision than they've made in the past under very similar circumstances Oh I agree 100%, I just also happen to think usada has been far too strict at times in the past. --- *runs out of topic naked* <cite>codey posted [p:914871994] in Jon Jones ... [t:77340711]...</cite> <quote><cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>codey posted...</cite> <quote>From what Jeff Novitzky said, he only testes positive for the long term metabolites, which provide no no benefit or something. The period in which he was tested was close enough to a previous test (like 20 days) that he would have had to test positive to for the short and medium term metabolites as well, but was clean. The going theory is that it's a pulsing effect with the long term metabolites. That's not to say Jon isn't a POS idiot, but I'm not sure he actually took anythingthis time. This is the same steroid he tested positive for the last time, but there's no indication of the metabolites that should be present if he ingested it between tests. Not to mention the tested levels in his tests have always been at 0 or so microscopic an account they were determined by outside arbitrators to be of no benefit to performance.</quote> The problem is USADA has suspended others that have similar stories and testing histories, like Frank Mir. Even if you think the story is plausible, and it is, it's a different decision than they've made in the past under very similar circumstances</quote> Oh I agree 100%, I just also happen to think usada has been far too strict at times in the past. --- runs out of topic naked </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1