My point is no one supports banning alcohol and tobacco, so why should less harmful substances like weed be banned?.
You know what's also less dangerous than alcohol or tobacco? Or even weed, for that matter? Driving without a seat belt. 99.99% of the time if you drive somewhere and don't do your seat belt up, you'll arrive at the other side with absolutely no harm done, no long term consequences. And even if you do get in a crash, that crash has to fall in a narrow band (i.e. not so minor that the seat belt does nothing, but not so horrific that the seat belt also does nothing because it, your car, and you are now a pile of scrap metal and raw meat) for the seat belt to actually make a difference.
Yet driving without a seat belt is illegal and no one really bats an eye at it or suggests it shouldn't be. Point being, just because something is mostly safe that doesn't mean that's a good argument for it being legal.
I do!!! I use seat belts, but I don't think the government should require it. If I wanna be a GAMEFAQS CENSORED THIS WORD and hurt my self why should they stop me? this is supposed to be the land of the free.
and isnt the shit being mostly safe actually a reason for it to be legal? lol dude your logic is ass backwards. seat belts and weed are not even in the same ballpark