LogFAQs > #923361011

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Why did we just let Square get away with charging more than $60 for a new game?
TheGreatGeno326 06/15/19 5:30:32 PM #10:	0xDEFECADE posted... due to inflation, games costing 60$ in the 2000s should cost 80$ now Hell, NES games in the 80s used to be $40 or more, which would be around $100 now --- Formerly Known as Genocet_10-325 Conservatism is a plague on society. <cite>TheGreatGeno326 posted [p:923361011] in Why did we... [t:77793182]...</cite> <quote><cite>0xDEFECADE posted...</cite> <quote>due to inflation, games costing 60$ in the 2000s should cost 80$ now</quote> Hell, NES games in the 80s used to be $40 or more, which would be around $100 now --- Formerly Known as Genocet_10-325 Conservatism is a plague on society.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1