LogFAQs > #924175747

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	TIL that making a topic about someone's post is "harassment"
0AbsoluteZero0 07/03/19 1:14:07 AM #9:	SailorGoon posted... Which is weird since topics about Duncan are still up. Yep. Topics that are actually aimed at harassing users like Duncan dont have shit done about them. Gotta love the absurd inconsistency. Consider this gem about paying a dollar to have Vegy and Fake Vegy banned - clearly antagonistic, but apparently A-okay. https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/77829642 Axiom posted... The new mod system of appeals is so obviously aimed at discouraging disputes that I don't know why they even bothered pretending otherwise. Allen might has well have just said "We're fucking tired of reading and responding to disputes so here's the new deal. I'm putting in a vote system so I don't have to reply to them anymore. Don't like it then just accept your moderations" Also I have definitely noticed it becoming more of a babyfaqs recently. Flame rule was stupid enough but now moderations are being handed out for even more ridiculous things than usual Its unfortunate, but youre spot on. Things started getting worse when they adopted the zero tolerance flaming rules a year or so ago, and the terrible moderating has really been cranked up to 11 since they added the new mods a few months ago. I appreciate that our volunteer mods are willing to give their time to clean up the message boards here, but the end result has been undeniably abysmal, and its been compounded by the extreme discouragement of appealing like you said. Setting up a 66% threshold for appeal success and disallowing any further conversation or clarification after the mod vote is just pathetic. --- -The Admirable <cite>0AbsoluteZero0 posted [p:924175747] in TIL that m... [t:77836703]...</cite> <quote><cite>SailorGoon posted...</cite> <quote>Which is weird since topics about Duncan are still up.</quote> Yep. Topics that are actually aimed at harassing users like Duncan dont have shit done about them. Gotta love the absurd inconsistency. Consider this gem about paying a dollar to have Vegy and Fake Vegy banned - clearly antagonistic, but apparently A-okay. https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/77829642 <cite>Axiom posted...</cite> <quote>The new mod system of appeals is so obviously aimed at discouraging disputes that I don't know why they even bothered pretending otherwise. Allen might has well have just said "We're fucking tired of reading and responding to disputes so here's the new deal. I'm putting in a vote system so I don't have to reply to them anymore. Don't like it then just accept your moderations" Also I have definitely noticed it becoming more of a babyfaqs recently. Flame rule was stupid enough but now moderations are being handed out for even more ridiculous things than usual</quote> Its unfortunate, but youre spot on. Things started getting worse when they adopted the zero tolerance flaming rules a year or so ago, and the terrible moderating has really been cranked up to 11 since they added the new mods a few months ago. I appreciate that our volunteer mods are willing to give their time to clean up the message boards here, but the end result has been undeniably abysmal, and its been compounded by the extreme discouragement of appealing like you said. Setting up a 66% threshold for appeal success and disallowing any further conversation or clarification after the mod vote is just pathetic. --- -The Admirable</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1