LogFAQs > #924572820

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	lowest gamer unemployment in american history
Taily_Po 07/12/19 12:31:21 AM #19:	OniRonin posted... ...the U3 is a BLS statistic literally gathered the way I just said. This is your first post in this topic, how the fuck am I supposed to know everything everyone has ever said No, it wasn't my first, although I guess I can understand the mistake considering you're not as active on these boards but I'm Zeus. Archgoat posted... Zeus posted... Archgoat posted... It is funny that it was a fudge stat when unemployment was low under Obama, but now that stat is just fine. The same report still not including people no longer looking for work. Almost as funny as when it was good under Obama, but questionable under GWB, right? I don't really recall that argument back then, but unemployment went to shit under Bush, and it made great gains under Obama, but the rhetoric from the right was always that it was not a real stat because it didn't include people not looking for work (retired and other). I just find the hypocrisy funny. The situation has always been what it was, excluding under Clinton but that's mostly because he moved people from welfare and unemployment onto disability. --- "If I were a ghost, this is certainly the kind of place I'd haunt." <cite>Taily_Po posted [p:924572820] in lowest gam... [t:77836073]...</cite> <quote><cite>OniRonin posted...</cite> <quote><quote>...the U3 is a BLS statistic literally gathered the way I just said. </quote> This is your first post in this topic, how the fuck am I supposed to know everything everyone has ever said</quote> No, it wasn't my first, although I guess I can understand the mistake considering you're not as active on these boards but I'm Zeus. <cite>Archgoat posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Archgoat posted...</cite> <quote>It is funny that it was a fudge stat when unemployment was low under Obama, but now that stat is just fine. The same report still not including people no longer looking for work.</quote> Almost as funny as when it was good under Obama, but questionable under GWB, right?</quote> I don't really recall that argument back then, but unemployment went to shit under Bush, and it made great gains under Obama, but the rhetoric from the right was always that it was not a real stat because it didn't include people not looking for work (retired and other). I just find the hypocrisy funny.</quote> The situation has always been what it was, excluding under Clinton but that's mostly because he moved people from welfare and unemployment onto disability. --- "If I were a ghost, this is certainly the kind of place I'd haunt."</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1