LogFAQs > #924793160

I still think WWE would benefit from decreasing its roster size. I forget what the number of superstars is (200/300?), it's no wonder the glut of talent (20-30, maybe even 50 people are main event caliber, or at least good enough no one would bat an eye). But 50 people should be THE roster size in general. I mean, we already know people like Ziggler are just spinning their wheels, collecting a paycheck. I don't think anyone buys him as anyone doing anything in any feud. Drew practically dragged him to career "revival" of sorts kicking and screaming last year, only for Extreme Rules to go by and be like, "Yep, he's done."

At most, 6-10 people for Top 3 feuds of any given show, tag and women's divisions, and bells and whistles. I can't fathom why WWE has people like Balor, Nakamura, and Rusev on pre-shows, just because they aren't "Vince's favorite toy" at the moment. I'm starting to think Punk was right about the whole "cog on a wheel" thing. Outside of very rare cases, I couldn't tell you what makes Andrade different than Cesaro, aside from appearance and having a manager.
---

"Evening caress, Always yearning, I must confess, The stars aren't burning"
Copernicus - Candlemass