LogFAQs > #926476992

Doctor Foxx posted...

Yo a moderation history exists to demonstrate that a person has been made aware of the rules and what breaks them. Those notify without deletes are less harsh, posts used to be deleted and karma was almost always lost if there was a violation. Now it's a warning. Don't do it again.

Some people break the same rule over and over and over

It gets a harsher punishment when a user is well aware of breaking the same rules

I'd like to know how that's unreasonable

In any other situation intent needs to be proven. Ive had mods and suspensions where they literally made up what my intention was, and in one case, which post I was responding to which made a world of difference. I could say they honestly believed I was intentionally typing something that I knowingly would get a mod for, but that was the case - they were looking to mod me because I explained exactly what had happened and they just said, in other words Nope. Thats not what you meant. ...I would hate to see these guys go to court and try to argue that.

Last one I got was especially funny. Apparently I bypassed the censor by inserting an emote in place of a letter of a swear word, as is printed on the hat I was talking about, and they said typing it is censor bypassing but if I had posted a picture of the hat itself, that says the same thing, that would have been okay. More to that is that if I had typed the whole word out and let the system censor it with asterisks, that also would have been okay

---

I'm right, as expected.