LogFAQs > #927254815

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Vic Mignogna's court case is imploding. He no-showed the last hearing
Darmik 09/10/19 6:04:21 PM #95:	EverDownward posted... Tyranthraxus posted... EverDownward posted... This is quite the turn around. Up until the hearing, it seemed like Vic was gonna win it. Now he's no-showing? Jesus, what a mess. No it never seemed that way to anyone except Zikten You're exaggerating, the guy definitely had support and from a cursory glance it looked like Vic was never in any real trouble (of losing the case, I mean). I have to assert, however, I haven't actually been following the case save for on the most superficial of domains. He was exaggerating in the sense that Zikten wasn't the only person who thought he'd win but nobody who actually looked into the case outside of Vic Stans thought that at all. For months now there have been several lawyers on social media pointing out the inherent misunderstanding of the law on display. Anyone who did so would get personally attacked by his fanbase. These guys have been locked away in their YouTube bubble watching videos explaining all of the ways they'll win and anyone opposing Vic will pay and they're still in denial over it. --- Kind Regards, Darmik <cite>Darmik posted [p:927254815] in Vic Mignog... [t:77999471]...</cite> <quote>EverDownward posted...</cite> <quote>Tyranthraxus posted...</cite> <quote>EverDownward posted... </cite> <quote>This is quite the turn around. Up until the hearing, it seemed like Vic was gonna win it. Now he's no-showing? Jesus, what a mess.</quote>No it never seemed that way to anyone except Zikten </quote> You're exaggerating, the guy definitely had support and from a cursory glance it looked like Vic was never in any real trouble (of losing the case, I mean). I have to assert, however, I haven't actually been following the case save for on the most superficial of domains.</quote> He was exaggerating in the sense that Zikten wasn't the only person who thought he'd win but nobody who actually looked into the case outside of Vic Stans thought that at all. For months now there have been several lawyers on social media pointing out the inherent misunderstanding of the law on display. Anyone who did so would get personally attacked by his fanbase. These guys have been locked away in their YouTube bubble watching videos explaining all of the ways they'll win and anyone opposing Vic will pay and they're still in denial over it. --- Kind Regards, Darmik</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1