LogFAQs > #927611978

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicAnti-Gay Tramps Win Case and are ALLOWED to REFUSE Business to GAY PEOPLE!!!
LinkPizza
09/18/19 12:43:39 PM
#52:


Kyuubi4269 posted...
LinkPizza posted...
Why should a certain set of people starve because the store won't serve them?

I don't think the law makes people serve them, just punishes those that don't, so I don't think it's productive.

LinkPizza posted...
You could probably get news coverage for that. And some chain would probably go out there and build a store quick to help or "help". Especially if they realized they wouldn't have competition...

See this is why I think a law is inappropriate as there are other methods like this that solve the problem more effectively.

That's if they could. If a chain just goes to a random small city where the mom an pop grocery store lets everybody buy, they could end up doing poorly as people would shop there. So they sometimes might avoid certain small towns. They would know without information that a grocery store is limited customers for whatever reason without being there. Meaning they won't be there. I'd rather not rely on them maybe figuring out. And it doesn't always mean they'll come. And even then, who know's how long it will take to get the store up and running. If you don't mind people starving because someone doesn't like somebody, that's fine. I'd rather people not starve...
---
Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1