LogFAQs > #927645215

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Anti-Gay Tramps Win Case and are ALLOWED to REFUSE Business to GAY PEOPLE!!!
Kyuubi4269 09/19/19 2:50:57 AM #61:	LinkPizza posted... No. That would make headlines quick, causing another business to be able to go down there. And because of what was going on, they would probably get a bigger budget to work with, meaning they could build faster. And possibly open up a miniature market of sorts to be able to sell foods and drinks for the duration of the build. That already applies without the law though. If a business discriminates, the people can kick up a stink, make headlines and a bigger budget business comes and buys them out. If an area is so rural that there's only one food store in an hours drive, there's definitely enough space to set up a mini market to compete. LinkPizza posted... If we just let the business do its thing by discriminating, nothing might change. Nothing would change if nobody cares about the discrimination, and if nobody cares if you can't eat, then it's probably for the best to move instead of getting the only grocery in town shut down. LinkPizza posted... Instead of letting people discriminate, stop them. Some will probably give up and let them shop. Others will lose all costumers and have to close down, as they should... If the only option to get food is via a discriminatory seller, is it not better to have that seller than no option at all? adjl posted... Preventing businesses from creating new disadvantages, however? That seems fair, Prior to making the business, nobody had any advantage though. They're refusing service from their store, not intercepting them going somewhere else. You seem to be coming from the position that the shopkeepers started off without discriminating then changed their tune, but in reality they have always operated this way. adjl posted... Basically, just don't make people's lives worse for no reason, and you're good. And that's what they're doing, they're continuing to discriminate as they always have. --- Doctor Foxx posted... The demonizing of soy has a lot to do with xenophobic ideas. <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted [p:927645215] in Anti-Gay T... [t:78019771]...</cite> <quote>LinkPizza posted...</cite> <quote>No. That would make headlines quick, causing another business to be able to go down there. And because of what was going on, they would probably get a bigger budget to work with, meaning they could build faster. And possibly open up a miniature market of sorts to be able to sell foods and drinks for the duration of the build. </quote> That already applies without the law though. If a business discriminates, the people can kick up a stink, make headlines and a bigger budget business comes and buys them out. If an area is so rural that there's only one food store in an hours drive, there's definitely enough space to set up a mini market to compete. LinkPizza posted...</cite> <quote>If we just let the business do its thing by discriminating, nothing might change.</quote> Nothing would change if nobody cares about the discrimination, and if nobody cares if you can't eat, then it's probably for the best to move instead of getting the only grocery in town shut down. LinkPizza posted...</cite> <quote>Instead of letting people discriminate, stop them. Some will probably give up and let them shop. Others will lose all costumers and have to close down, as they should...</quote> If the only option to get food is via a discriminatory seller, is it not better to have that seller than no option at all? adjl posted...</cite> <quote>Preventing businesses from creating new disadvantages, however? That seems fair,</quote> Prior to making the business, nobody had any advantage though. They're refusing service from their store, not intercepting them going somewhere else. You seem to be coming from the position that the shopkeepers started off without discriminating then changed their tune, but in reality they have always operated this way. adjl posted...</cite> <quote>Basically, just don't make people's lives worse for no reason, and you're good.</quote> And that's what they're doing, they're continuing to discriminate as they always have. --- Doctor Foxx posted... The demonizing of soy has a lot to do with xenophobic ideas.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1