LogFAQs > #927668873

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Anti-Gay Tramps Win Case and are ALLOWED to REFUSE Business to GAY PEOPLE!!!
Kyuubi4269 09/19/19 4:16:26 PM #73:	_AdjI_ posted... Irrelevant. It's the entire point. You can't go up to any person and demand they sell you stuff and a business is run by people. They don't owe you, they're giving you an opportunity. _AdjI_ posted... by operating in a manner that excludes a group, that group is likely to be deprived of the ability to get the service without traveling. Nobody is entitled to a store nearby, the fact most people have the advantage doesn't mean they're disadvantaged, just that everybody is complacent over their privileged position. _AdjI_ posted... You're really going to go with "the closeted gay person is the villain here, not the homophobic dickwad"? Really? I'm not debating morals with you. I'm simply explaining how they aren't entitled to access. It's like how it's illegal to steal food to feed your family; it's not immoral, but it's still not allowed. You can't make somebody give you benefits because you deserve it. _AdjI_ posted... Irrelevant. The new guy's still an asshole. It's not illegal to be an asshole, and it's inappropriate for the government to enforce morals. _AdjI_ posted... Oh no! They were afraid that people might think they were assholes for acting like assholes, so they had to hide it! How horrible! That's the system I actually want. People should act on what demand is and what risks they're willing to take, I don't think it should be legally enforced. _AdjI_ posted... 0 is disadvantaged relative to +1. Unless you're going to try telling somebody with 0 food that they should be glad they don't have -1 food. 0 is advantaged relative to -1, that's not a useful metric. Do you also think people selling their home should be forced to give their home to a homeless person? They're very disadvataged, no home or no money! They want to discriminate against the poor and sell their home to a wealthy person, but according to you they can't make the homeless person disadvantaged by not letting them buy it for a crumpled up one. --- Doctor Foxx posted... The demonizing of soy has a lot to do with xenophobic ideas. <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted [p:927668873] in Anti-Gay T... [t:78019771]...</cite> <quote>_AdjI_ posted...</cite> <quote>Irrelevant.</quote> It's the entire point. You can't go up to any person and demand they sell you stuff and a business is run by people. They don't owe you, they're giving you an opportunity. _AdjI_ posted...</cite> <quote>by operating in a manner that excludes a group, that group is likely to be deprived of the ability to get the service without traveling.</quote> Nobody is entitled to a store nearby, the fact most people have the advantage doesn't mean they're disadvantaged, just that everybody is complacent over their privileged position. _AdjI_ posted...</cite> <quote>You're really going to go with "the closeted gay person is the villain here, not the homophobic dickwad"? Really?</quote> I'm not debating morals with you. I'm simply explaining how they aren't entitled to access. It's like how it's illegal to steal food to feed your family; it's not immoral, but it's still not allowed. You can't make somebody give you benefits because you deserve it. _AdjI_ posted...</cite> <quote>Irrelevant. The new guy's still an asshole.</quote> It's not illegal to be an asshole, and it's inappropriate for the government to enforce morals. _AdjI_ posted...</cite> <quote>Oh no! They were afraid that people might think they were assholes for acting like assholes, so they had to hide it! How horrible!</quote> That's the system I actually want. People should act on what demand is and what risks they're willing to take, I don't think it should be legally enforced. _AdjI_ posted...</cite> <quote>0 is disadvantaged relative to +1. Unless you're going to try telling somebody with 0 food that they should be glad they don't have -1 food.</quote> 0 is advantaged relative to -1, that's not a useful metric. Do you also think people selling their home should be forced to give their home to a homeless person? They're very disadvataged, no home or no money! They want to discriminate against the poor and sell their home to a wealthy person, but according to you they can't make the homeless person disadvantaged by not letting them buy it for a crumpled up one. --- Doctor Foxx posted... The demonizing of soy has a lot to do with xenophobic ideas.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1