LogFAQs > #928067986

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	The President has resorted to screaming his catchphrases on Twitter
Antifar 09/28/19 3:13:47 PM #47:	DarkRoast posted... Even by your standards, this is an aggressively obtuse effort to pretend that both parties are equally bad. God knows there are Democrats with blood on their hands; half their senators voted for the invasion. But this does not in any way absolve the Bush administration of its responsibility for fabricating the case for war. If you want to cite Wikipedia, you'll note the start date for the War in Iraq is listed as 2003, and that "Following the election of George W. Bush as president in 2000, the US moved towards a more aggressive Iraq policy. The Republican Party's campaign platform in the 2000 election called for "full implementation" of the Iraq Liberation Act as "a starting point" in a plan to "remove" Saddam.[84] However, little formal movement towards an invasion occurred until the 11 September attacks.[85]" Grow up and come back when you have a worldview beyond reflexive centrism in the face of any and all evidence to the contrary. You're burying your head in your ass and celebrating the fact that you've found a place between both sides. --- kin to all that throbs <cite>Antifar posted [p:928067986] in The Presid... [t:78048280]...</cite> <quote>DarkRoast posted...</cite> <quote> </quote> Even by your standards, this is an aggressively obtuse effort to pretend that both parties are equally bad. God knows there are Democrats with blood on their hands; half their senators voted for the invasion. But this does not in any way absolve the Bush administration of its responsibility for fabricating the case for war. If you want to cite Wikipedia, you'll note the start date for the War in Iraq is listed as 2003, and that "Following the election of George W. Bush as president in 2000, the US moved towards a more aggressive Iraq policy. The Republican Party's campaign platform in the 2000 election called for "full implementation" of the Iraq Liberation Act as "a starting point" in a plan to "remove" Saddam.[84] However, little formal movement towards an invasion occurred until the 11 September attacks.[85]" Grow up and come back when you have a worldview beyond reflexive centrism in the face of any and all evidence to the contrary. You're burying your head in your ass and celebrating the fact that you've found a place between both sides. --- kin to all that throbs</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1