LogFAQs > #928291220

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicIf the age of consent went down to 16...
Lost_All_Senses
10/03/19 4:32:28 PM
#23:


the0rebirth posted...
If the age of consent was 20, people would judge you just as harshly for being 22 and dating an 18/19-year-old as they'd currently judge you for being 20 and dating a 16/17-year-old. Basically, it is indeed arbitrary, but only to an extent. Most people go through puberty when they're around 13, but that's obviously too young to be having sex and/or getting involved in relationships. I think the age of consent should ideally be based on a combination of biology and the expected maturation of the average person by a given age based on the way society is structured (i.e., in a theoretical society where the average 17-year-old is as smart/skilled/capable as the average real-life 23-year-old, a younger age of consent would be understandable).


I can guarantee any young chick that wants to fuck gets thrown into the "smarter/skilled/capable" section just so you can justify your moves. That's the problem right there. It's literally the first thing guys say to justify relationships with young chicks. Even though they obviously an average minded girl to the rest of the world.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1