LogFAQs > #930224198

FLOUR posted...

Yeah, I get it. Only vaxxed people have the right to be a walking biohazzard. So nobody would have a problem with them infecting the immunosuppressed since there's a less likely chance of it happening. Instead of banning unvaccinated kids, wouldn't it make more sense to ban the kids that actually have the freaking measles? Then when it subsides they can return to school. And I don't get the seatbelt analogy. The argument is how measles affects others, not yourself. How do your wearing a seatbelt benefit someone that doesn't?

Uh the point of requiring vaccines is to minimize the amount of people that are even carrying a disease. They aren't 100% effective, but some diseases were basically eradicated before anti-vax movements caused their reoccurrence.

I don't think anyone is encouraging sick people to walk around in public and infect everyone as long as they have some vaccines in them, so "ban sick people" seems like a stupid and irrelevant argument. Spreading diseases is bad. Willfully making you or your children vectors for those diseases is even worse.