LogFAQs > #930548260

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Politics Containment Topic 249: Phase 1 of a scheduled topic series
HeroDelTiempo17 11/22/19 6:39:16 PM #351:	I think occasionally about the scenario that seems really realistic to me, in which Pete or Biden are elected and after doing the "you'll get to keep your current plan!" appeal, they actually push a strong public option through, the healthcare market changes dramatically, employers and insurances shuffle plans around, and now everyone is pissed because they LIED about keeping your plan! Why would you set yourself up to get owned like that? It makes no sense. And the answer is - if they instead implement a bad public option, they get to keep both promises because the healthcare system won't really change. And that's the entire concern with the moderate approach! --- DPOblivion was far more determined than me. <cite>HeroDelTiempo17 posted [p:930548260] in Politics C... [t:78176791]...</cite> <quote>I think occasionally about the scenario that seems really realistic to me, in which Pete or Biden are elected and after doing the "you'll get to keep your current plan!" appeal, they actually push a strong public option through, the healthcare market changes dramatically, employers and insurances shuffle plans around, and now everyone is pissed because they LIED about keeping your plan! Why would you set yourself up to get owned like that? It makes no sense. And the answer is - if they instead implement a bad public option, they get to keep both promises because the healthcare system won't really change. And that's the entire concern with the moderate approach! --- DPOblivion was far more determined than me.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1