LogFAQs > #930805940

Which is also unreliable due to not being a remotely comprehensive picture of the "before" state. It's useful for doctors to identify the emergence of symptoms, but it doesn't capture everything that might have happened prior to the parents becoming concerned. For something as subtle as a developmental disorder, signs and symptoms are usually around for a while before somebody notices something, unless they're looking really closely the whole time.

Except parents dont start recording kids only when they notice something is wrong. They have videos showing a kid exhibiting no ASD behaviors, and then videos post vaccination showing the loss of speech, eye contact, name response, etc.

Weve been here already, and are just going around in circles.

Which I'll need to see a citation on. Preferably with details on the alleged data manipulations

Dr. William Thompson is the CDC whistleblower with nothing to gain and all to lose by doing so. Like most whistleblowers. Thats not some random guy on the internet. Not some news caster whose sponsors include pharmaceuticals. A senior scientist at the CDC.

should also make the point of looking at basic probabilities: If we presume that autism symptoms are going to show up between the ages of 1 and 2, then "within a week of their MMR vaccine" actually refers to a solid 2% of that time frame. That number only grows if we start to include other vaccines around that time. That means you are going to get a few hundred people per year noticing autism symptoms within a few days of their kid's vaccine through sheer random chance, without needing to infer any sort of causal relationship for that.

Are you saying that Im the only one finding numerous people at my 3 most recent jobs, and in everyday life, with this same story? Oh wait. I guess this is anecdotal and it shouldnt be trusted.

And even if I discount the ones that have made the connection between the beginning of their childs symptoms and vaccination date... theres still a shit ton more people with an ASD child than there was 20 years ago.

1/5,000 in 1975 compared to 1/59 today. Ignoring the increase in number of vaccines today versus back then... it still should be a cause for concern. But all big pharma wants you to know is that vaccines didnt do it. We dont know what causes autism... but all we can say is that its definitely not our vaccines.

And lets not forget, that The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program continues to pay out. Remember, they dont just GIVE money out because you just say what you do. You have to have medical records, video recording; evidence.
---

Don't runaway from troubles... instead meet them Hedons.