LogFAQs > #931328508

<a onclick="return show_quoted_message(400, 78239019, 931327961, '3b565724');" href="/boards/400-current-events/78239019/931327961"><a onclick="return show_quoted_message(400, 78239019, 931327961, '3b565724');" href="/boards/400-current-events/78239019/931327961">legendary_zell posted... </a></a>

They are when concentrated wealth is used to hold communities hostage by tying their jobs to not exercising worker power through unions or threatening to leave if they have to pay a living wage to employees. It's bad when that wealth is used to distort the political system through campaign donations, access buying, and warping where society can even seek funds from. It's bad when the wealthy use their influence to pay for custom made laws like they do through organizations like ALEC. It's bad when they use their concentrated wealth to purchase news organizations around the world and limit news that could challenge their power. It's pretty bad when they pay for fake studies that downplay the damage their money generating businesses are doing to society and the planet or when they pay to suppress true science.

None of that could happen without the extreme concentration of wealth and it all seems pretty negative to me.

There's no jealousy involved, that's simply a reflexive talking point that the wealthy have you spouting for free. Concentrated wealth paid for that rhetoric and you're not benefitting from it.

keep in mind that you're talking to Proudclad

---

peanut butter and dick