LogFAQs > #931832288

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicWas Tulsi Gabbard wise in voting "present" on both articles?
Gaawa_chan
12/20/19 3:19:21 AM
#22:


DeathMagnetic80 posted...
She's just been trying to undermine the party ever since she got all mad at Hillary.
Uh... no. Clinton and Co started it. When she endorsed Bernie Sanders, they immediately began calling her a Russian shill. Gabbard has every right to be pissed off with the Clinton toadies trying to insinuate that she's a treasonous plant just because she didn't endorse their queen, and every right to fire back when they shot first.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3609

And this is coming from someone who does not particularly like Gabbard.

Edit: Let's be clear, the reason why this vote of hers is stupid is this:
I think the guy is guilty but wont say it because I didnt like the way the prosecutor and the defence argued all the time.
The argument is absurd. It's clear that the only reason that she did this is because she's in desperate need of press coverage at this point.

---
Hi
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1