Topic List | Page List: 1 |
---|---|
Topic | Politics Containment Topic 254: Pete's Whine Cave |
red sox 777 12/20/19 7:40:09 PM #248: | Mr Lasastryke posted... damn these topics move so fast To me it's just good reading comprehension. I think at this point, taking Trump literally is just abdicating one's ability to read and comprehend meaning. Trump has made it absolutely clear that any statement he makes cannot be relied upon for its literal truth. Of course Hillary was being grossly generalistic. Her statement itself was generalistic (one-half of Trump supporters is a very vague and general figure) but removing the generalism doesn't change the meaning and doesn't remove the insult. Whether it was 50% or 52% or 48.796% really doesn't change the meaning. It's still insulting a very large portion of the American electorate. Now, if Hillary had been exaggerating rather than generalizing - say, she multiplied all her statements by a factor of 10 - then the statement would need to be read as saying 5% of Trump supporters are deplorable - which sounds reasonable. But Hillary does not have a history of exaggerating, gave no sign that she was exaggerating, and didn't even say so after the fact. So I think it's fair to say that Hillary meant a number somewhere more in the ballpark of 50% than 5%. And yeah, if DJT made the exact same statement, you can apply the 90% rule and assume he means 5%. Because if it was really 50% he would have said 100%. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! ... Copied to Clipboard! |
Topic List | Page List: 1 |