LogFAQs > #931918072

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Trump Officially Creates another Military Branch, the 'Space Force'...
LinkPizza 12/22/19 9:38:58 AM #44:	And well get those people as we need them. Getting them now means people just sitting around wasting more money than we need to right now. So why waste money on hiring people to do what we already have people doing when we can hire more as we need more? Or, if they want more personnel, they can hire more for the Air Force where we already do research and keep an eye on space already. That literally works, too... There is no reason to pretend were not ahead as we are already. We already have trained professionals. Its just called the Air Force instead of the space force. Thats the only difference. Like I said, I dont see how giving them a different name will just magically make us a step further in space superiority... And we have our own space programs, too. Other than NASA, the Air Force does donstuff with space. Just because its not advertised out the ass doesnt mean we dont. We have to as its literally part of our mission... So, we are ahead of the curve. Making a new branch doesnt do anything new or special except a shiny new name... Which does literally nothing... Why cant we assume that. Most people are dedicated to one job. So, we have enough personnel for those jobs. By taking away space from the Air Force, that takes away bases and personnel. We dont keep all our personnel if we dont have the same responsibilities. Less responsibilities means less personnel. So, either we have an Air Force with X personnel, or an Air Force with .7(x) personnel and a Space Force with .3(x) personnel. So, in the end, we still have x personnel (x being a variable)... So, we already have people trained for doing things with space like watching, monitoring, and stuff like that. They can always train more people to handle anything else they need. Which they still do. You just have to be smart and do well on the ASVAB, and have a good recruiter... Battle maybe a thing in space sometimes. Probably in 100 years of so. Maybe then well need a Space Force. Until then, its a waste... And we are not behind. Idk why you even think that. If we already have people dedicated to monitoring space, we already have a Space Force in the Air Force. A new name doesnt change anything... They already defend satellites. Why difference does it make if the Air Force or the Space Force defends it? Its make no difference as either is trained to do their job... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:931918072] in Trump Offi... [t:78272409]...</cite> <quote>And well get those people as we need them. Getting them now means people just sitting around wasting more money than we need to right now. So why waste money on hiring people to do what we already have people doing when we can hire more as we need more? Or, if they want more personnel, they can hire more for the Air Force where we already do research and keep an eye on space already. That literally works, too... There is no reason to pretend were not ahead as we are already. We already have trained professionals. Its just called the Air Force instead of the space force. Thats the only difference. Like I said, I dont see how giving them a different name will just magically make us a step further in space superiority... And we have our own space programs, too. Other than NASA, the Air Force does donstuff with space. Just because its not advertised out the ass doesnt mean we dont. We have to as its literally part of our mission... So, we are ahead of the curve. Making a new branch doesnt do anything new or special except a shiny new name... Which does literally nothing... Why cant we assume that. Most people are dedicated to one job. So, we have enough personnel for those jobs. By taking away space from the Air Force, that takes away bases and personnel. We dont keep all our personnel if we dont have the same responsibilities. Less responsibilities means less personnel. So, either we have an Air Force with X personnel, or an Air Force with .7(x) personnel and a Space Force with .3(x) personnel. So, in the end, we still have x personnel (x being a variable)... So, we already have people trained for doing things with space like watching, monitoring, and stuff like that. They can always train more people to handle anything else they need. Which they still do. You just have to be smart and do well on the ASVAB, and have a good recruiter... Battle maybe a thing in space sometimes. Probably in 100 years of so. Maybe then well need a Space Force. Until then, its a waste... And we are not behind. Idk why you even think that. If we already have people dedicated to monitoring space, we already have a Space Force in the Air Force. A new name doesnt change anything... They already defend satellites. Why difference does it make if the Air Force or the Space Force defends it? Its make no difference as either is trained to do their job... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1