| Topic List | Page List: 1 |
|---|---|
| Topic | POLL: Who does NOT belong on the Mount Rushmore of WWE? |
| The Popo 12/28/19 11:21:17 AM #33: | lilJoe457 posted... Why do people include undertaker in lists like this? WWE really over hypes his value. Taker never helped business grow. Like at all. What helped the wwf was Austin and then the rock. Putting taker before the rock is asinine. Undertaker is HHH tier to me. They're good fodder but they're not draws at all. Taker is a top 10 guy in WWE history. Hes like a Hank Aaron, who is seen as an all time great in baseball history, but only won 1 MVP over a very long career while being seen as one of the best every single year. Id personally put him 5th. The only truly iconic faces that carried WWF/E since the wrestling boom in the 80s have been Hogan, Austin, Rock, and Cena. Thats my Rushmore. After that, its guys who were pushed to the top and were beloved performers, but not anyone who put the WWE on their shoulders. --- Live action Hungry Hungry Hippos though, now that was a sport. ~Aeon Azuran ... Copied to Clipboard! |
| Topic List | Page List: 1 |