LogFAQs > #933027790

Warren: 12
Yang: 12
Bloomberg: 11
Buttigieg: 11
Sanders: 11
Steyer: 11
Gabbard: 10
Biden: 9
Klobuchar: 9

What stands out:
Bloomberg and Biden against marijuana legalisation, for "state's rights".
Candidates divided on fracking and wealth tax.
Obvious disagreements on healthcare.
Gabbard and Sanders against carbon tax.
All candidates for restoration of voting rights after release.
All candidates for allowing federal funding for abortions (if you have a zero somewhere, you're pro-"life").
Gabbard, Warren, Yang willing to consider UBI.
Sanders and Warren for jobs guarantee. I said "no" but, honestly, not too different than funding the military.
Sanders to halt all deportations, Buttigieg and Yang to deport recent crossers (migrant workers?), everyone else for focusing on criminals and "threats".
Warren and Sanders to get rid of private insurance. While I'm against companies like Cigna, Humana, and United Health, I'm fine with supplemental insurance like Aflac, as long as people understand what it is.
Everyone for paid family leave, even Republicans to an extent. Anyone with a zero is missing the point.
Even split on if the President should reduce the debt. Anyone with a zero on Sanders or Warren should not be voting for Trump or any Republican candidate.
Even split on expanding Supreme Court.
Yang only candidate for nuclear power.
All candidates for reducing cost of college, just different plans.
All candidates for reducing student loan debt.
Bloomberg and Yang only candidates pro-electoral college. Still judging TC...
Biden, Bloomberg, and Yang for free trade.


---

"You're sorely underestimating the power of nostalgia goggles." - adjl
http://www.smbc-comics.com/comics/20110218.gif