LogFAQs > #933786152

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Honest question: why didn't the House call these witnesses?
aDirtyShisno 02/01/20 2:42:34 PM #17:	Mead posted... yet there is no requirement for them to have done so and no reason for the senate to go out of their way to suppress testimony beyond a cover up You literally say there is no requirement for the House to call the additional witnesses, then impose a requirement that the Senate MUST call the additional witnesses or else they are covering up what the House refused to investigate! You sir, are insane. Good day sir. --- Que sera, sera. Whatever happens, happens. ...and he was never heard from again. <cite>aDirtyShisno posted [p:933786152] in Honest que... [t:78374820]...</cite> <quote>Mead posted... </cite> <quote>yet there is no requirement for them to have done so and no reason for the senate to go out of their way to suppress testimony beyond a cover up</quote> You literally say there is no requirement for the House to call the additional witnesses, then impose a requirement that the Senate MUST call the additional witnesses or else they are covering up what the House refused to investigate! You sir, are insane. Good day sir. --- Que sera, sera. Whatever happens, happens. ...and he was never heard from again.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1