LogFAQs > #933809908

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicHonest question: why didn't the House call these witnesses?
BeerOnTap
02/02/20 1:14:58 AM
#31:


Mead posted...
If it isnt then why not let him speak at the trial

unless of course they dont actually want to dig any deeper and find out the truth

Okay so lets pretend that is the case for certain: the senate is voting not to call witnesses because having Bolton or Parnas testify would be devastating to the President. That still doesnt excuse the House Dems from not going ahead and calling these witnesses. And your point completely dodges the main question of this thread. The Dems could have, should have, and heck, technically can even still, call witnesses to testify in the house if they want to.
Is there nobody here willing to acknowledge that they dropped the ball? Or is partisan finger pointing more important?
Because of their refusal to call witnesses in the House themselves, it allows one to safely assume that perhaps there really isnt much of a case there to begin with.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1