LogFAQs > #934104496

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicTrump fires Gordon Sondland, prominent witness in the impeachment inquiry.
glitteringfairy
02/08/20 1:54:07 PM
#98:


Sackgurl posted...
your interpretation of that section is flawed. you have to consider the entire subsection, not just the part that says what you want to believe it says.

as in, the president does not get to retroactively exclude staff from whistleblower protection.

but yes, the president has the responsibility to properly enforce employment discrimination protections relating to national security. he cannot be jailed for breaking this law simply because, despite his guilt, he controls the outcome of such a case.

the founding fathers would tell us that the appropriate solution is to impeach him.
"The founding Fathers"

Lmao shut the fuck. You have no clue what they would do. These laws didn't exist back them. There was no such thing as "work place discrimination" in the 18th century.

---
"How come you can believe in God but not Bigfoot? V-E-G-Y https://imgur.com/AqR3aeX https://imgur.com/vvuUXpp https://i.imgtc.com/lyRboFN.jpg
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1