LogFAQs > #935005519

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	In 1965 CEOs in US earned 20x more than the average worker. In 2015 it was 300x
Broseph_Stalin 02/28/20 4:59:54 PM #57:	E32005 posted... your only examples are massive global corps. most people are employed by medium sized business. even there the difference is criminal As I've said multiple times, the people running those medium sized companies don't get as much compensation as the people running massive global corps, meaning my point remains true. It wouldn't matter if you divided billions of dollars among hundreds of thousands of workers or millions among thousands, lower CEO pay would not positively impact workers because the amount spent on them is actually very small. Companies pay a market rate to get as good a CEO as they can to make sure they are successful, which is what actually impacts workers wages. <cite>Broseph_Stalin posted [p:935005519] in In 1965 CE... [t:78437158]...</cite> <quote>E32005 posted... </cite> <quote>your only examples are massive global corps. most people are employed by medium sized business. even there the difference is criminal</quote> As I've said multiple times, the people running those medium sized companies don't get as much compensation as the people running massive global corps, meaning my point remains true. It wouldn't matter if you divided billions of dollars among hundreds of thousands of workers or millions among thousands, lower CEO pay would not positively impact workers because the amount spent on them is actually very small. Companies pay a market rate to get as good a CEO as they can to make sure they are successful, which is what actually impacts workers wages. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1