LogFAQs > #935902869

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Politics Containment Topic 285: The Ends Justify the Means Testing
ChaosTonyV4 03/19/20 2:47:30 PM #14:	HeroDelTiempo17 posted... How do you reconcile that with unless you are arguing for accelerationism or straight up revolution? Do you honestly think the progressive movement will achieve better results under a Trump presidency? It was an idealized hypothetical in response to someone saying "this is the best thing for progressives". And no, a regular Trump presidency would not be better for progressives because we have potentially 2 seats on the Supreme Court coming up, but a Trump Presidency where Dems control everything? That'd be great. He'd be totally impotent for 4 years, if he managed to not get removed, and then in 2024 a Dem would have the advantage, and (hopefully) a progressive Dem even moreso. --- Phantom Dust. "I'll just wait for time to prove me right again." - Vlado <cite>ChaosTonyV4 posted [p:935902869] in Politics C... [t:78485443]...</cite> <quote>HeroDelTiempo17 posted... </cite> <quote>How do you reconcile that with unless you are arguing for accelerationism or straight up revolution? Do you honestly think the progressive movement will achieve better results under a Trump presidency?</quote> It was an idealized hypothetical in response to someone saying "this is the best thing for progressives". And no, a regular Trump presidency would not be better for progressives because we have potentially 2 seats on the Supreme Court coming up, but a Trump Presidency where Dems control everything? That'd be great. He'd be totally impotent for 4 years, if he managed to not get removed, and then in 2024 a Dem would have the advantage, and (hopefully) a progressive Dem even moreso. --- Phantom Dust. "I'll just wait for time to prove me right again." - Vlado</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1