LogFAQs > #938850801

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Star Wars trilogies
CassandraCain 05/08/20 8:53:16 PM #72:	Because nostalgia is easy money and Kylo staying bad would have been too risky Even though they literally had nothing to lose. They should have just gone all risk at that point and it would have turned out better. Instead they backtracked and made a much worse movie, also retroactively making the entire trilogy pretty bad overall. It's sad. Especially since Kylo deserved so so much better as he was easily the best character and his conclusion felt super cheap. --- I don't kill... but I don't lose either. <cite>CassandraCain posted [p:938850801] in Star Wars ... [t:78670052]...</cite> <quote>Because nostalgia is easy money and Kylo staying bad would have been too risky Even though they literally had nothing to lose. They should have just gone all risk at that point and it would have turned out better. Instead they backtracked and made a much worse movie, also retroactively making the entire trilogy pretty bad overall. It's sad. Especially since Kylo deserved so so much better as he was easily the best character and his conclusion felt super cheap. --- I don't kill... but I don't lose either.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1