LogFAQs > #938995385

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	DA rules Ahmaud Arbery Killing JUSTIFIED, now asks FEDERAL GOV'T to take over!!!
LinkPizza 05/11/20 5:29:49 PM #87:	Kyuubi4269 posted... He was supposed to run or comply, not start a fight with a guy with a gun. His fuck up got him killed. That's a guess at best. And a bigger risk. Turning you back on a person who stalked you and had a gun. He probably thought he had a better chance at defending himself. It's possible they wouldn't have shot. But they most likely would have... Kyuubi4269 posted... Just because you say it is, doesn't mean it is. China is third world according to aid and it's richer than the US and behaves as badly. It's not just me, though. It's the literal definition... Kyuubi4269 posted... Fighting for a gun isn't a smart response though, life's not a jackie chan movie. Who said anything about life being a Jackie Chan movie? When you believe it's you're only chance at survival, you do what it takes. He was scared of being shot by a gun. He could either run and risk be shot in the back. Or could disarm he attackers. Kyuubi4269 posted... He was a recorded house invader and accused burglar, it's pretty damning. Turns out the threat of arrest was terrifying enough to this supposedly innocent man that he felt the need to fight. From what people are saying in this topic, they found one video that was possibly him. And even then, that was only trespassing. So, not really that damning. And who knows if there was a threat of arrest. Pointing a gun at an unarmed person would filled many innocent people with the need to fight. Are you really trying to troll saying that only guilty people should use self-defense? --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:938995385] in DA rules A... [t:78677171]...</cite> <quote>Kyuubi4269 posted...</cite> <quote>He was supposed to run or comply, not start a fight with a guy with a gun. His fuck up got him killed.</quote> That's a guess at best. And a bigger risk. Turning you back on a person who stalked you and had a gun. He probably thought he had a better chance at defending himself. It's possible they wouldn't have shot. But they most likely would have... Kyuubi4269 posted...</cite> <quote>Just because you say it is, doesn't mean it is. China is third world according to aid and it's richer than the US and behaves as badly.</quote> It's not just me, though. It's the literal definition... Kyuubi4269 posted...</cite> <quote>Fighting for a gun isn't a smart response though, life's not a jackie chan movie.</quote> Who said anything about life being a Jackie Chan movie? When you believe it's you're only chance at survival, you do what it takes. He was scared of being shot by a gun. He could either run and risk be shot in the back. Or could disarm he attackers. Kyuubi4269 posted...</cite> <quote>He was a recorded house invader and accused burglar, it's pretty damning. Turns out the threat of arrest was terrifying enough to this supposedly innocent man that he felt the need to fight.</quote> From what people are saying in this topic, they found one video that was possibly him. And even then, that was only trespassing. So, not really that damning. And who knows if there was a threat of arrest. Pointing a gun at an unarmed person would filled many innocent people with the need to fight. Are you really trying to troll saying that only guilty people should use self-defense? --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1